tukey multiple comparison adjustment Search Results


tukey–kramer multiple comparisons test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc tukey–kramer multiple comparisons test
Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pmc06260428-165-3-18?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey–kramer multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey's multiple comparison test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc tukey's multiple comparison test
Tukey's Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pmc10721873__41467_2023_44109_MOESM2_ESM-701-28-38?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey's multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey’s multiple comparisons test built in graphpad prism 9.0  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc tukey’s multiple comparisons test built in graphpad prism 9.0
Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test Built In Graphpad Prism 9.0, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pm35644119-94-25-27?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey’s multiple comparisons test built in graphpad prism 9.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anova tests and multiple comparisons  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc anova tests and multiple comparisons
Anova Tests And Multiple Comparisons, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pmc10274871-118-6-18?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova tests and multiple comparisons - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anova mixed-effects model and tukey’s multiple comparison test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc anova mixed-effects model and tukey’s multiple comparison test
Anova Mixed Effects Model And Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pm38257177-104-5-14?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova mixed-effects model and tukey’s multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Anova And Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparison Tests, Kruskal Wallis And Dunn’s Post Test, Log Rank Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pmc07429183-152-13-27?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
analysis of variance with tukey’s multiple comparison  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc analysis of variance with tukey’s multiple comparison
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Analysis Of Variance With Tukey’s Multiple Comparison, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pmc06463514-152-0-17?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
analysis of variance with tukey’s multiple comparison - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
two-way analysis of variance followed by a tukey-kramer multiple comparison test  (ncss llc)
90
ncss llc two-way analysis of variance followed by a tukey-kramer multiple comparison test
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Two Way Analysis Of Variance Followed By A Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by ncss llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/10__1128_slash_jvi__00166___06-24-5-16?v=ncss+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
two-way analysis of variance followed by a tukey-kramer multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey’s multiple-comparisons test  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute tukey’s multiple-comparisons test
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Tukey’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pm20399225-128-7-9?v=SAS+institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey’s multiple-comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
two-way analysis of variance (anova) with tukey's multiple comparisons test  (Technical Manufacturing Company)
90
Technical Manufacturing Company two-way analysis of variance (anova) with tukey's multiple comparisons test
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Two Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) With Tukey's Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by Technical Manufacturing Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/10__1096_slash_fj__201902257rr-141-23-33?v=Technical+Manufacturing+Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
two-way analysis of variance (anova) with tukey's multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey–kramer multiple comparison test graphpad instat version 3.05  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc tukey–kramer multiple comparison test graphpad instat version 3.05
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparison Test Graphpad Instat Version 3.05, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pm19914226-115-9-13?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey–kramer multiple comparison test graphpad instat version 3.05 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
nested one-way anova with a tukey’s multiple comparison test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc nested one-way anova with a tukey’s multiple comparison test
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Nested One Way Anova With A Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey+multiple+comparison+adjustment/pmc08105358-192-6-17?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nested one-way anova with a tukey’s multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < 0.001). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < 0.001). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Proliferation: Ki67 + cells/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01); ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05; ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406, representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification. Apoptosis: TUNEL + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05): ( F ) M-406 N. S; Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test; ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Proliferation: Ki67 + cells/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01); ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05; ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406, representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification. Apoptosis: TUNEL + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05): ( F ) M-406 N. S; Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test; ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, TUNEL Assay, Comparison

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) representative tumor sections from M-234p and M-406, 400×. In both models the behavior was similar. Control group: ( A ) M-234p and ( C ) M-406: capillaries with small endothelial cells with barely stained nuclei and intercellular gaps (yellow arrow), lack of pericytes or cells with structure and staining compatible with pericytes. Cy+Los group: ( B ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406: intra- and peritumoral capillaries with structure and morphology similar to normal tissues. Endothelial cells with defined nuclei provide a continuous uninterrupted lining (yellow arrow), and well defined basal membrane covered with pericytes (red arrow). M-406 magnified section (1000×): vessel with normal vascular morphology. HIF1α expression: HIF1α + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), ( F ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05), ( G ) and H ), representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) representative tumor sections from M-234p and M-406, 400×. In both models the behavior was similar. Control group: ( A ) M-234p and ( C ) M-406: capillaries with small endothelial cells with barely stained nuclei and intercellular gaps (yellow arrow), lack of pericytes or cells with structure and staining compatible with pericytes. Cy+Los group: ( B ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406: intra- and peritumoral capillaries with structure and morphology similar to normal tissues. Endothelial cells with defined nuclei provide a continuous uninterrupted lining (yellow arrow), and well defined basal membrane covered with pericytes (red arrow). M-406 magnified section (1000×): vessel with normal vascular morphology. HIF1α expression: HIF1α + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), ( F ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05), ( G ) and H ), representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Staining, Membrane, Expressing, Comparison

M-234p: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, N. S. ( D ) Th17 cells, N. S. M-406: ( E ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( F ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( G ) Treg cells, ( P = 0.064). ( H ) Th17 cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P = 0.0580). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: M-234p: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, N. S. ( D ) Th17 cells, N. S. M-406: ( E ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( F ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( G ) Treg cells, ( P = 0.064). ( H ) Th17 cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P = 0.0580). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Lymphocytes/field (median, range). M-234p: ( A ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( C ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Los, P < 0.05, vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( D – F ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification; M-406: ( G ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( H ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( I ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( J – L ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lymphocytes/field (median, range). M-234p: ( A ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( C ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Los, P < 0.05, vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( D – F ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification; M-406: ( G ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( H ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( I ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( J – L ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Quantification of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by flow cytometry: M-234p, day 42, Cy vs Cy+Los: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, ( P < 0.001). ( D ) Th17 cells, ( P < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post -test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by flow cytometry: M-234p, day 42, Cy vs Cy+Los: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, ( P < 0.001). ( D ) Th17 cells, ( P < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post -test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Comparison

αSMA : % of αSMA + area/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Los, ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.01). ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy, ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001). ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Collagen : % of collagen area/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01). ( F ) M-406 N. S. ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: αSMA : % of αSMA + area/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Los, ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.01). ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy, ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001). ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Collagen : % of collagen area/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01). ( F ) M-406 N. S. ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison